Computational Screening of Functional Monomers for Esculetin Recognition Using a Semiempirical Tight-Binding Approach

Main Article Content

Dia Indah Azhari
Akmal Djamaan
Aiyi Asnawi
Purnawan Pontana Putra

Abstract

Esculetin is a bioactive coumarin derivative with reported antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and anticancer activities. Despite its pharmacological relevance, achieving selective molecular recognition of esculetin in complex systems remains challenging. Computational screening of functional monomers offers a rational strategy to identify candidates capable of forming stable noncovalent interactions with the target molecule. In this study, 21 monomers were evaluated using a semiempirical extended tight-binding (xTB) approach. Initial screening was performed through automated interaction site screening (aISS) to estimate interaction
energies. The aISS results identified 4-vinylbenzeneboronic acid as having the most favorable interaction energy (-312.87 kcal/mol), followed by 2-Acrylamido-2-methyl-1-propanesulfonic acid (-25.34 kcal/mol), p-vinylbenzoic acid (-24.71 kcal/mol), trans-3-(3-pyridyl)acrylic acid (-23.04 kcal/mol), and 9-vinylcarbazole (-22.17 kcal/mol). To evaluate dynamic stability, selected complexes were subjected to molecular dynamics simulations. The results showed that 2-Acrylamido-2-methyl-1-propanesulfonic acid exhibited the lowest average energy (-76.301 kcal/mol), followed by p-vinylbenzoic acid (-70.03 kcal/mol) and 4-vinylbenzeneboronic acid (-69.70 kcal/mol). Metadynamics simulations further confirmed this trend, with total energy (Etot) values of -76.23 kcal/mol, -69.96 kcal/mol, and -69.64 kcal/mol for the same monomers, respectively. The consistency between molecular dynamics and metadynamics analyses indicates that 2-Acrylamido-2-methyl-1-propanesulfonic acid forms the most energetically stable complex with esculetin under simulated conditions. This study provides a computational basis for selecting functional monomers for esculetin recognition systems and supports further experimental validation.

Article Details

How to Cite
Azhari, D. I., Djamaan, A., Asnawi, A., & Putra, P. P. (2026). Computational Screening of Functional Monomers for Esculetin Recognition Using a Semiempirical Tight-Binding Approach. Jurnal Sains Farmasi & Klinis, 13(1), 61–69. https://doi.org/10.25077/jsfk.13.1.61-69.2026
Section
Research Articles

References

[1]. Garg SS, Gupta J, Sahu D, Liu C-J. Pharmacological and

Therapeutic Applications of Esculetin. Int J Mol Sci.

2022;23(20):12643. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms232012643

[2]. Liang C, Ju W, Pei S, Tang Y, Xiao Y. Pharmacological Activities

and Synthesis of Esculetin and Its Derivatives: A Mini-Review.

Molecules. 2017;22(3):387.

https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules22030387

[3]. Cai T, Cai B. Pharmacological activities of esculin and esculetin:

A review. Medicine (Baltimore). 2023;102(40):e35306.

https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000035306

[4]. Asnawi A, Febrina E, Aligita W, Aman LO, Razi F. Molecular

docking and molecular dynamics study of 3-hydroxybutyrate

with polymers for diabetic ketoacidosis-targeted molecularly

imprinted polymers. J Pharm Pharmacogn Res.

2024;12(5):822–36.

https://doi.org/10.56499/jppres23.1926_12.5.822

[5]. Gunawan U, Ibrahim S, Ivansyah AL, Damayanti S. Unraveling

multi-template molecularly imprinted polymer for selective

extraction of triazole antifungals: Theoretical and experimental

investigation. React Funct Polym. 2024;200:105915.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reactfunctpolym.2024.105915

[6]. Razwan Sardar M, Jin Y, Kong G, Li H, Lin J-M. Molecularly

imprinted polymer for pre-concentration of esculetin from

tobacco followed by the UPLC analysis. Sci China Chem.

2014;57(12):1751–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11426-014-

5180-1

[7]. Suryana S, Mutakin, Rosandi Y, Hasanah AN. An Update on

Molecularly Imprinted Polymer Design through a

Computational Approach to Produce Molecular Recognition

Material with Enhanced Analytical Performance. Molecules.

2021;26(7):1891. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26071891

[8]. Rajpal S, Mishra P, Mizaikoff B. Rational In Silico Design of

Molecularly Imprinted Polymers: Current Challenges and

Future Potential. Int J Mol Sci. 2023;24(7):6785.

https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24076785

[9]. Grimme S, Bannwarth C, Shushkov P. A Robust and Accurate

Tight-Binding Quantum Chemical Method for Structures,

Vibrational Frequencies, and Noncovalent Interactions of Large

Molecular Systems Parametrized for All spd-Block Elements ( Z

= 1–86). J Chem Theory Comput. 2017;13(5):1989–2009.

https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jctc.7b00118

[10]. Bannwarth C, Ehlert S, Grimme S. GFN2-xTB - An Accurate and

Broadly Parametrized Self-Consistent Tight-Binding Quantum

Chemical Method with Multipole Electrostatics and DensityDependent Dispersion Contributions. J Chem Theory Comput.

2019;15(3):1652–71.

https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jctc.8b01176

[11]. Plett C, Grimme S. Automated and Efficient Generation of

General Molecular Aggregate Structures. Angew Chemie Int Ed.

2023;62(4). https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.202214477

[12]. Humphrey W, Dalke A, Schulten K. VMD: Visual molecular

dynamics. J Mol Graph. 1996;14(1):33–8.

https://doi.org/10.1016/0263-7855(96)00018-5

[13]. Pantsar T, Poso A. Binding Affinity via Docking: Fact and Fiction.

Molecules. 2018;23(8):1899.

https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules23081899

[14]. Ahmed U, Sundholm D, Johansson MP. The effect of hydrogen

bonding on the π depletion and the π–π stacking interaction.

Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2024;26(43):27431–8.

https://doi.org/10.1039/D4CP02889A

[15]. Xu Z, Uddin KMA, Kamra T, Schnadt J, Ye L. Fluorescent Boronic

Acid Polymer Grafted on Silica Particles for Affinity Separation

of Saccharides. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2014;6(3):1406–14.

https://doi.org/10.1021/am405531n

[16]. Liu Y, Yang D, Shi D, Sun J. A TD‐DFT study on the hydrogen

bonding of three esculetin complexes in electronically excited

states: Strengthening and weakening. J Comput Chem.

2011;32(16):3475–84. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcc.21932

[17]. Li X, Long Y, Zhang C, Sun C, Hu B, Lu P, et al. Hydrogen Bond

and π-π Stacking Interaction: Stabilization Mechanism of Two

Metal Cyclo-N5 --Containing Energetic Materials. ACS omega.

2022;7(8):6627–39.

https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.1c05961

[18]. WULFF G. ChemInform Abstract: Molecular Imprinting in Cross‐

Linked Materials with the Aid of Molecular Templates ‐ A Way

towards Artificial Antibodies. ChemInform. 1995;26(51):1812–

32. https://doi.org/10.1002/chin.199551298

[19]. Shi H, Zhuang Q, Zheng A, Guan Y, Wei D, Xu X. Study of the

radical polymerization mechanism and its application in the

preparation of high-performance PMMA by reactive extrusion.

RSC Adv. 2023;13(11):7225–36.

https://doi.org/10.1039/D2RA06441C

[20]. Mohanty M, Mohanty PS. Molecular docking in organic,

inorganic, and hybrid systems: a tutorial review. Monatshefte

für Chemie - Chem Mon. 2023;154(7):683–707.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s00706-023-03076-1

[21]. Zuo K, Kranjc A, Capelli R, Rossetti G, Nechushtai R, Carloni P.

Metadynamics simulations of ligands binding to protein

surfaces: a novel tool for rational drug design. Phys Chem Chem

Phys. 2023;25(20):13819–24.

https://doi.org/10.1039/D3CP01388J

[22]. Olsson GD, Wiklander JG, Nicholls IA. Using Molecular

Dynamics in the Study of Molecularly Imprinted Polymers. In:

Molecularly Imprinted Polymers. 2021. p. 241–68.

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-1629-1_21

[23]. Bussi G, Laio A. Using metadynamics to explore complex freeenergy landscapes. Nat Rev Phys. 2020;2(4):200–12.

https://doi.org/10.1038/s42254-020-0153-0